John Durie | May 15, 2008
PROGRESS towards the federal Government's circa $10 billion fibre network is likely to be delayed while Telstra is told to improve the details on its existing network map.

Communications Minister Stephen Conroy clearly wants to have a competitive tender in time to get the network build started before the next election
Communications Minister Senator Stephen Conroy is expected to delay the June 25 deadline for submission of tenders to give rivals a chance to see the updated information.
The main concerns relate to information on networks in rural and remote areas.
Operating on leaked information, the rival G9 network has been critical of the quality of the Telstra network map.
It is unlikely the Government will accede to G9's request for a five-month delay.
Conroy clearly wants to have a competitive tender in time to get the network build started before the next election.
The federal budget papers made clear the ACCC will play a key role in the network tender, and after the network is built. Conroy has said the same in past speeches.
Optus boss Paul O'Sullivan yesterday made it clear G9 would lodge a tender and in the past has said the fibre network worked with returns of 10 to 12 per cent, compared with Telstra's 18 per cent-plus.
O'Sullivan submitted to his parent company board plans to sue the Government to recover the $20 million in costs incurred on the failed Opel tender.
Conroy axed the planned $1 billion subsidy for a rural wireless network earlier this week and the move not only made good policy sense, but was one of the key money-saving features in this week's budget.
For O'Sullivan, who had to explain to his board the loss of a $1 billion handout, the issues are a bit different and he would be keen to draw a line in the sand in Canberra even if he risks exposing internal documents on the proposed rural network.
The legal action shouldn't affect his progress on the broadband bid.
Macquarie Bank, which is being advised by former senior Telstra executive Ted Pretty, will lodge a tender for the network build with Leighton and is likely at some stage to join with Optus.
The same doesn't apply to Deutsche Telekom, which is apparently not proposing to invest money in the venture but instead to be the operator of an independent network.
Optus's fourth-quarter profit figures released yesterday showed signs it is back on the attack.
Telstra likes to say it is the only one that invests in Australia, but the facts show Optus has invested $1 billion a year and while its parent has more exciting opportunities outside Australia, there are no real signs that capital is being withheld.
Last year Optus grew free cash flow by 21 per cent, while the parent company grew it by 27.9 per cent.
Revenues for Optus grew by 3.8 per cent against system growth of 4.3 per cent and Singtel growth at 11 per cent.
The big positive was the first annual increase in earnings before interest tax and depreciation in three years, even if at 0.7 per cent it was much slower than the 5.8 per cent for its parent company.
Your Comments:
6 Comment(s)
So "Tony" of Melbourne, which PR department in Telstra do you work for again? They've obviously got broken keyboards 'cause you can't find a full stop button to save your life....
Interesting to note you've commented on every telecommunication article on this site with a pro-Telstra stance.
Poor Peter of Sydney he doesnt like it when companies make profits prefers loss making businesses cant understand why because if it werent for profits Telstra would not have built NextG but Peter of Sydney prefers that Australia remains a low telco tech country so he can save a few pennys after all it aint cheap living in sydney people there are willing and happy to pay sky high prices for silly litte four by two units !!
The great tragety will be if Telstra get have thier monopoly FTTN network.. Watch to price of Access skyrocket while they set new records for profit of the backs of Australian families. Telstra cannot and should not be trusted.
the two most evil words in the english language... SHARE HOLDERS
Of course they're playing the violin. Do you think Telstra wouldn't if they had been given the tender only to have it taken away? Of course they would ... and they would do it with a much bigger violin.
Optus still playing the violin even thought its parent company Singtel has the management skills to be ahead of this bid these ploys only serve there own interests and not those of the present government and im sure Mr Conroy will be asking himself why is a company with the skills and know how not taking the initiative rather than playing under dog card !
Post A Comment
We welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide a screen name and suburb/location - these will be published. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. Read our publication guidelines.
Share This Article
From here you can use the Social Web links to save Rivals can't follow Telstra's map to a social bookmarking site.
Email To A Friend